Last Updated : Jan 19 2019 2:18PM     Screen Reader Access
News Highlights
PM Modi dedicates to nation Armoured Systems Complex at Hazira, Gujarat to produce Howitzer artillery guns under make in India Programme            Women to get 20% jobs in Military Police, says Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman            EAM Sushma Swaraj says terrorism is most serious challenge towards international peace, security            Mexico: 21 people killed in fuel pipeline explosion in central Hidalgo state            Indian Challenge ends at Malaysia Masters as Saina Nehwal loses to Carolina Marin of Spain in semifinal           

National News

Jan 10, 2019
9:27PM

SC to hear Ayodhya land dispute case on Jan 29

Representational Pic
Supreme Court has fixed hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land title dispute case for 29th of this month. The Constituition Bench hearing the case  is to be reconstituted after Justice UU Lalit recused himself from the case. 

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for a Muslim party, told the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi that  Justice Lalit appeared for former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh in 1994. Though Dhavan said he was not seeking Justice Lalit's recusal, the judge opted out of the hearing in the matter. Other members of the bench comprised Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde, NV Ramana, and DY Chandrachud. 

Dhavan also drew the attention of the bench to the fact that the matter was earlier fixed for hearing before a three-judge bench but the CJI took a decision to list it before a five-judge Constitution Bench.
  
The CJI said in view of the  facts and circumstances of the matter and the voluminous records pertaining to it, this was a fit case for constituting a five-judge bench.

 In its order, the bench said the apex court registry will physically examine the records stored in 50 sealed trunks in the room, which has also been kept sealed.

The top court said the records pertaining to the matter are voluminous and some of the documents are in Sanskrit, Arabic, Urdu, Hindi, Persian and Gurmukhi that need to be translated. If required, the apex court registry can take the service of official translators, the bench said.

As many as 14 appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgement. The High Court had ordered that the 2.77 acre land be partitioned equally among the three parties - the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla. Various Hindutva organisations have been demanding an ordinance on early construction of Ram temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya. Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had suggested that any decision on an ordinance on Ram temple in Ayodhya can happen only after the completion of the judicial process. 

   Related News

Live Twitter Feed

Listen News

Morning News 19 (Jan) Midday News 18 (Jan) News at Nine 18 (Jan) Hourly 19 (Jan) (1300hrs)
समाचार प्रभात 19 (Jan) दोपहर समाचार 18 (Jan) समाचार संध्या 18 (Jan) प्रति घंटा समाचार 19 (Jan) (1305hrs)
Khabarnama (Mor) 19 (Jan) Khabrein(Day) 19 (Jan) Khabrein(Eve) 18 (Jan)
Aaj Savere 19 (Jan) Parikrama 18 (Jan) Lok Ruchi Samachar 13 (Jan)

Listen Programs

Market Mantra 18 (Jan) Samayki 18 (Jan) Sports Scan 18 (Jan) Spotlight/News Analysis 18 (Jan)
    Public Speak

    Country wide 17 (Jan) Surkhiyon Mein 17 (Jan) Charcha Ka Vishai Ha 16 (Jan) Vaad-Samvaad 15 (Jan) Money Talk 15 (Jan) Current Affairs 18 (Jan)